Learn · Part 5. Special situations · 5 min read
After PCI or CABG, and repeat testing
How the criteria treat symptomatic and asymptomatic patients after a stent or bypass, CCTA limits, and the warranty period of a normal test.
60-second take
- With symptoms after PCI or CABG, the AUC separates anginal or similar symptoms from nonanginal ones. Without symptoms, it separates by time: 2 years after PCI and 5 years after CABG.
- CCTA is reasonable for stents 3 mm or larger and for graft patency. It is harder in small stents, and CT-derived FFR is not validated in stents or grafts.
- In patients with no change in status, routine periodic CCTA or stress testing is not recommended by the 2023 chronic coronary disease guideline.
- The 2021 chest pain guideline gives warranty periods for a normal test (2 years for angiogram or CCTA without plaque, 1 year for a stress test with adequate stress), in the setting of acute chest pain with ACS ruled out.
- "Not specified by the AUCs" means no criteria cover that combination. Individualize with the patient's cardiologist.
Symptoms first, then time
After a stent (percutaneous coronary intervention, PCI) or bypass surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting, CABG), the 2023 multimodality AUC asks two questions in order: is the patient having symptoms, and if not, how long has it been? It rates symptomatic patients with prior MI or revascularization in Table 1.3, and asymptomatic patients with prior revascularization or MI in Table 2.2 .
If the patient has symptoms
Table 1.3 separates patients whose symptoms are anginal, or similar to a past ischemic episode, from those with nonanginal symptoms . The authors explain the intent. With anginal symptoms, invasive testing may be warranted. With symptoms that are clearly not cardiac, ischemia testing can often be deferred. After the ISCHEMIA trial, they also say either testing or deferral may suit a symptomatic patient with prior revascularization, depending on preference and the individual situation .
The chest pain guideline adds that in patients with known coronary disease, clinicians should intensify medical therapy first when they can, and defer testing . See how the criteria treat the two symptom groups after PCI:
Example from the tool
Prior PCI, symptoms similar to prior ischemic episode and/or anginal symptoms
- Exercise ECGMay Be Appropriate
- Exercise SPECTAppropriate
- Pharmacologic SPECTAppropriate
- Pharmacologic PETAppropriate
- Exercise echoAppropriate
- Dobutamine echoAppropriate
- Stress CMRAppropriate
- CAC scoreRarely Appropriate
- CCTAMay Be Appropriate
- Invasive angiographyAppropriate
- No testMay Be Appropriate
Example from the tool
Prior PCI, nonanginal symptoms
- Exercise ECGMay Be Appropriate
- Exercise SPECTMay Be Appropriate
- Pharmacologic SPECTMay Be Appropriate
- Pharmacologic PETMay Be Appropriate
- Exercise echoMay Be Appropriate
- Dobutamine echoMay Be Appropriate
- Stress CMRMay Be Appropriate
- CAC scoreRarely Appropriate
- CCTAMay Be Appropriate
- Invasive angiographyRarely Appropriate
- No testMay Be Appropriate
If the patient has no symptoms
Table 2.2 splits asymptomatic patients by time since the procedure: under or over 2 years after PCI, and under or over 5 years after CABG . It also lists incomplete revascularization, prior high-risk PCI and high risk for silent ischemia as separate scenarios. The AUC notes that routine, surveillance-type imaging means testing only because time has passed, not because anything changed .
Example from the tool
<2 y after PCI
- Exercise ECGRarely Appropriate
- Exercise SPECTRarely Appropriate
- Pharmacologic SPECTRarely Appropriate
- Pharmacologic PETRarely Appropriate
- Exercise echoRarely Appropriate
- Dobutamine echoRarely Appropriate
- Stress CMRRarely Appropriate
- CAC scoreRarely Appropriate
- CCTARarely Appropriate
- Invasive angiographyRarely Appropriate
- No testAppropriate
Example from the tool
>2 y after PCI
- Exercise ECGMay Be Appropriate
- Exercise SPECTMay Be Appropriate
- Pharmacologic SPECTMay Be Appropriate
- Pharmacologic PETMay Be Appropriate
- Exercise echoMay Be Appropriate
- Dobutamine echoMay Be Appropriate
- Stress CMRMay Be Appropriate
- CAC scoreRarely Appropriate
- CCTAMay Be Appropriate
- Invasive angiographyRarely Appropriate
- No testAppropriate
The PET AUC applies the same time cut-offs. Its stated reasoning is that the yield of testing is low early on, and that later on silent ischemia becomes more plausible, from occlusion of a single graft after CABG or from a new stenosis after PCI . The 2023 chronic coronary disease guideline is firmer: in patients with no change in clinical or functional status, routine periodic CCTA or stress testing is not recommended (no benefit), and routine periodic invasive angiography should not be done (harm) .
Stents, grafts and CT
CCTA can be used after revascularization, but the stent matters. Both the chest pain guideline and the chronic coronary disease guideline say CCTA is reasonable to evaluate graft or stent patency after revascularization (stable chest pain in one, a change in symptoms despite medical therapy in the other), for stents 3 mm or larger .
- Why stents are hard. Motion and beam-hardening artifacts, blooming of the stent struts, and calcified plaque in nearby segments can all limit the view of the lumen. The SCCT consensus notes that stable chest pain guidelines have generally preferred functional testing in symptomatic patients with prior stents, partly for this reason .
- Larger stents. The SCCT consensus calls CCTA appropriate for symptomatic patients with stents 3.0 mm or larger, with measures to help: strict heart-rate control (goal under 60 bpm), iterative and sharp-kernel reconstruction, and mono-energetic reconstruction where available .
- Smaller stents. It may be appropriate for stents under 3.0 mm, especially thin-strut stents (under 100 micrometres) that are proximal and not at a bifurcation . Studies suggest up to 11% of stents may not be evaluable .
- Bypass grafts. CCTA is highly accurate for graft patency (sensitivity and specificity of 0.98 each in a meta-analysis of 2,482 grafts). Native vessels in patients with prior CABG are harder, because disease is diffuse and severe .
- Computed FFR. CT-derived fractional flow reserve has not been validated in stents or bypass grafts. It can still be done in non-stented arteries .
Example from the tool
Isolated evaluation of bypass graft patency
- Exercise ECGRarely Appropriate
- Exercise SPECTMay Be Appropriate
- Pharmacologic SPECTMay Be Appropriate
- Pharmacologic PETMay Be Appropriate
- Exercise echoMay Be Appropriate
- Dobutamine echoMay Be Appropriate
- Stress CMRMay Be Appropriate
- CAC scoreRarely Appropriate
- CCTAAppropriate
- Invasive angiographyRarely Appropriate
- No testMay Be Appropriate
Repeat testing and the “warranty period”
The 2023 AUC says the diagnostic and prognostic value of a previous test generally declines over time . It also dropped the old 90-day rule for what counts as an earlier test in the same evaluation, calling that cut-off arbitrary . If a noninvasive test is equivocal or inconclusive and more testing is warranted, it assumes a different modality will be used .
The 2021 chest pain guideline offers the idea of a warranty period for a normal result :
| Normal result | Warranty |
|---|---|
| Coronary angiogram, or CCTA with no stenosis or plaque | 2 years |
| Stress test, given adequate stress | 1 year |
There are conditions. The guideline says that in patients with a recent normal test and no biomarker evidence of acute myocardial injury, further testing is of limited value provided stress was adequate, image quality was sufficient, and symptom frequency and stability have not changed. The intervals differ because few events follow a normal CCTA, whereas people with a normal stress test may still have significant plaque. The warranty for a normal SPECT is highly variable, depending on the type of stress, the patient and the ejection fraction .
When the tool says “Not specified by the AUCs”
Table 1.3 rates patients with prior MI or revascularization before any testing. Table 1.2 rates patients without known coronary disease after a test . Neither covers a patient with a stent or graft who has already had a stress test in this evaluation. Rather than invent a rating, the tool shows Not specified by the AUCs. The sensible next step is to individualize the decision with the patient’s cardiologist.
Example from the tool
Prior CABG, symptoms similar to prior ischemic episode and/or anginal symptoms — after stress imaging — normal
Prior CABG with anginal symptoms and a normal stress imaging test already done.
- Exercise ECGNot specified by the AUCs
- Exercise SPECTNot specified by the AUCs
- Pharmacologic SPECTNot specified by the AUCs
- Pharmacologic PETNot specified by the AUCs
- Exercise echoNot specified by the AUCs
- Dobutamine echoNot specified by the AUCs
- Stress CMRNot specified by the AUCs
- CAC scoreNot specified by the AUCs
- CCTANot specified by the AUCs
- Invasive angiographyNot specified by the AUCs
- No testNot specified by the AUCs
The PET AUC is specific to one such group. For symptomatic patients after CABG, or after PCI in multivessel disease, it addresses PET when exercise SPECT was equivocal, and the tool uses that source for the PET cell in those scenarios .
Open the scenario builder → to enter prior PCI or CABG, symptom status and any earlier test.
Try it in the tool
Sources cited on this page
Click a tag for the full reference. All references